Translations

Bezpieczeństwo wewnętrzne/1/en: Różnice pomiędzy wersjami

Z Encyklopedia Administracji Publicznej

(Utworzono nową stronę "'''INTERNAL SECURITY''' – refers to the process of satisfying the needs and interests of the society of a given country. This process is carried out in a complex envir...")
 
 
Linia 1: Linia 1:
'''INTERNAL SECURITY''' – refers to the process of satisfying the needs and interests of the society of a given country. This process is carried out in a complex environment, and its consequences apply not only to interested individuals and social groups, environments, regions and entire countries, but also to other communities, for example due to the spatial spread of threats that do not know the concept of “state border” (e.g., terrorism). The concept of i.s. results from the theory of the state that distinguishes two of its functions: external and internal. Thus, it is closely related to the institution of the state, which is why quite often in the legal doctrine the more detailed term is used: internal security of the state. On the other hand, as part of the safety education, the i.s. is being placed as part of national security. This kind of security is often understood in two ways. In the narrower view, i.s. refers to the basic (traditional) functions of the modern state: protection of the territory, political-systemic order, social stability and ensuring a sense of security for citizens (protection of life and health). On the other hand, a wider sense of i.s. goes beyond state institutions, as it derives from the spirit of liberalism, and also adopts a global (supranational) character resulting from various transnational forms of international cooperation. In this understanding of i.s. all social and cultural activities of people are included (e.g., activities of non-governmental organisations). In this situation, the issues of privatization of security and social security appear. The matters of i.s. have not yet received in-depth studies, therefore the concept is not universal. In particular countries, or parts of the world, it is interpreted differently. The nature, types and specificity of threats have an influence on its objective scope. In the United States (the term home security), it covers the issues of: terrorism, organised crime (including drugs), illegal migration and spying, which is the subject of federal institutions. On the other hand, the EU’s Internal Security Strategy lists the following threats: terrorism in every form – marked by absolute disregard for human life and democratic values; organised crime – in various forms, regardless of state borders; cybercrime – a global, technical, cross-border and anonymous threat to information systems; cross-border crime – having a major impact on everyday lives of Europeans; violence (in itself) – increasing the damage already caused by crime and harmful to the society; natural disasters and anthropogenic factors – such as: forest fires, earthquakes, floods, storms, droughts, energy failures and failures of large-scale IT systems[ [http://encyklopediaap.uw.edu.pl/index.php/Andrzej_Misiuk/en A. Misiuk] ].
+
'''INTERNAL SECURITY''' – refers to the process of satisfying the needs and interests of the society of a given country. This process is carried out in a complex environment, and its consequences apply not only to interested individuals and social groups, environments, regions and entire countries, but also to other communities, for example due to the spatial spread of threats that do not know the concept of “state border” (e.g., terrorism). The concept of i.s. results from the theory of the state that distinguishes two of its functions: external and internal. Thus, it is closely related to the institution of the state, which is why quite often in the legal doctrine the more detailed term is used: internal security of the state. On the other hand, as part of the safety education, the i.s. is being placed as part of national security. This kind of security is often understood in two ways. In the narrower view, i.s. refers to the basic (traditional) functions of the modern state: protection of the territory, political-systemic order, social stability and ensuring a sense of security for citizens (protection of life and health). On the other hand, a wider sense of i.s. goes beyond state institutions, as it derives from the spirit of liberalism, and also adopts a global (supranational) character resulting from various transnational forms of international cooperation. In this understanding of i.s. all social and cultural activities of people are included (e.g., activities of non-governmental organisations). In this situation, the issues of privatization of security and social security appear. The matters of i.s. have not yet received in-depth studies, therefore the concept is not universal. In particular countries, or parts of the world, it is interpreted differently. The nature, types and specificity of threats have an influence on its objective scope. In the United States (the term home security), it covers the issues of: terrorism, organised crime (including drugs), illegal migration and spying, which is the subject of federal institutions. On the other hand, the EU’s Internal Security Strategy lists the following threats: terrorism in every form – marked by absolute disregard for human life and democratic values; organised crime – in various forms, regardless of state borders; cybercrime – a global, technical, cross-border and anonymous threat to information systems; cross-border crime – having a major impact on everyday lives of Europeans; violence (in itself) – increasing the damage already caused by crime and harmful to the society; natural disasters and anthropogenic factors – such as: forest fires, earthquakes, floods, storms, droughts, energy failures and failures of large-scale IT systems [ [http://encyklopediaap.uw.edu.pl/index.php/Andrzej_Misiuk/en A. Misiuk] ].

Aktualna wersja na dzień 08:34, 17 maj 2018

Objaśnienie komunikatu (prześlij)

Ten komunikat nie posiada dokumentacji. Jeśli wiesz gdzie lub jak ten komunikat jest używany, możesz pomóc innym tłumaczom przez dodanie dokumentacji do tego komunikatu.

Tekst źródłowy komunikatu (Bezpieczeństwo wewnętrzne)
'''BEZPIECZEŃSTWO WEWNĘTRZNE''' – odnosi się do procesu zaspokajania potrzeb i interesów społeczeństwa danego kraju. Proces ten realizuje się w złożonym środowisku, a jego konsekwencje dotyczą nie tylko zainteresowanych osób i grup społecznych, środowisk, regionów i całych państw, ale odnoszą się także do innych społeczności, chociażby z uwagi na fakt przestrzennego rozprzestrzeniania się zagrożeń, które nie znają pojęcia „granica państwa” (np. terroryzm). Pojęcie b.w. wynika z teorii państwa, która rozróżnia dwie jego funkcje: zewnętrzną i wewnętrzną. Tak więc jest ściśle związane z instytucją państwa, dlatego też dość często w doktrynie prawa używa się dookreślenia: bezpieczeństwo wewnętrzne państwa. Z kolei w ramach nauki o bezpieczeństwie umieszcza się b.w. jako część składową bezpieczeństwa narodowego. Tego rodzaju bezpieczeństwo jest często dwojako pojmowane. W węższym ujęciu b.w. odnosi się do podstawowych (tradycyjnych) funkcji współczesnego państwa: ochrony terytorium, porządku polityczno-ustrojowego, stabilności społecznej oraz zapewnienie poczucia bezpieczeństwa obywateli (ochrona życia i zdrowia). Natomiast szeroki zakres b.w. wykracza poza instytucje państwowe, gdyż wywodzi się z ducha liberalizmu, a także przyjmuje globalny (ponadpaństwowy) charakter wynikający z różnych ponadnarodowych form międzynarodowego współdziałania. W takim rozumieniu b.w. mieści się wszelka aktywność społeczna i kulturowa ludzi (np. działalność organizacji pozarządowych). W takiej sytuacji pojawia się problematyka prywatyzacji bezpieczeństwa oraz bezpieczeństwa społecznego. Problematyka b.w. nie doczekała się jeszcze pogłębionych studiów, dlatego też pojęcie nie ma uniwersalnego charakteru. W poszczególnych krajach lub częściach świata jest różnie interpretowane. Wpływ na jego zakres przedmiotowy mają charakter, rodzaje i specyfika zagrożeń. W Stanach Zjednoczonych (określenie ''home security'') mieszczą się w jego ramach zagadnienia: terroryzmu, przestępczości zorganizowanej (w tym narkotykowej), nielegalnej migracji oraz szpiegostwo, czyli przedmiot działania federalnych instytucji. Z kolei w przyjętej przez UE Strategii Bezpieczeństwa Wewnętrznego wymienia się następujące zagrożenia: terroryzm w każdej postaci – cechujący się absolutnym lekceważeniem życia ludzkiego i wartości demokratycznych; przestępczość zorganizowana – w różnorodnych formach, bez względu na granice państwowe; cyberprzestępczość – stanowiąca globalne, techniczne, transgraniczne i anonimowe zagrożenie systemów informatycznych; przestępczość transgraniczna – mająca zasadniczy wpływ na życie codzienne Europejczyków; przemoc (sama w sobie) – zwiększająca szkody już wywoływane przestępczością i krzywdząca społeczeństwo; 
klęski żywiołowe i czynniki antropogeniczne – takie jak: pożary lasów, trzęsienia ziemi, powodzie, wichury, susze, awarie energetyczne i awarie systemów informatyczno-komunikacyjnych na dużą skalę [ [http://encyklopediaap.uw.edu.pl/index.php/Andrzej_Misiuk A. Misiuk] ].
Tłumaczenie'''INTERNAL SECURITY''' – refers to the process of satisfying the needs and interests of the society of a given country. This process is carried out in a complex environment, and its consequences apply not only to interested individuals and social groups, environments, regions and entire countries, but also to other communities, for example due to the spatial spread of threats that do not know the concept of “state border” (e.g., terrorism). The concept of i.s. results from the theory of the state that distinguishes two of its functions: external and internal. Thus, it is closely related to the institution of the state, which is why quite often in the legal doctrine the more detailed term is used: internal security of the state. On the other hand, as part of the safety education, the i.s. is being placed as part of national security. This kind of security is often understood in two ways. In the narrower view, i.s. refers to the basic (traditional) functions of the modern state: protection of the territory, political-systemic order, social stability and ensuring a sense of security for citizens (protection of life and health). On the other hand, a wider sense of i.s. goes beyond state institutions, as it derives from the spirit of liberalism, and also adopts a global (supranational) character resulting from various transnational forms of international cooperation. In this understanding of i.s. all social and cultural activities of people are included (e.g., activities of non-governmental organisations). In this situation, the issues of privatization of security and social security appear. The matters of i.s. have not yet received in-depth studies, therefore the concept is not universal. In particular countries, or parts of the world, it is interpreted differently. The nature, types and specificity of threats have an influence on its objective scope. In the United States (the term home security), it covers the issues of: terrorism, organised crime (including drugs), illegal migration and spying, which is the subject of federal institutions. On the other hand, the EU’s Internal Security Strategy lists the following threats: terrorism in every form – marked by absolute disregard for human life and democratic values; organised crime – in various forms, regardless of state borders; cybercrime – a global, technical, cross-border and anonymous threat to information systems; cross-border crime – having a major impact on everyday lives of Europeans; violence (in itself) – increasing the damage already caused by crime and harmful to the society; natural disasters and anthropogenic factors – such as: forest fires, earthquakes, floods, storms, droughts, energy failures and failures of large-scale IT systems [ [http://encyklopediaap.uw.edu.pl/index.php/Andrzej_Misiuk/en A. Misiuk] ].

INTERNAL SECURITY – refers to the process of satisfying the needs and interests of the society of a given country. This process is carried out in a complex environment, and its consequences apply not only to interested individuals and social groups, environments, regions and entire countries, but also to other communities, for example due to the spatial spread of threats that do not know the concept of “state border” (e.g., terrorism). The concept of i.s. results from the theory of the state that distinguishes two of its functions: external and internal. Thus, it is closely related to the institution of the state, which is why quite often in the legal doctrine the more detailed term is used: internal security of the state. On the other hand, as part of the safety education, the i.s. is being placed as part of national security. This kind of security is often understood in two ways. In the narrower view, i.s. refers to the basic (traditional) functions of the modern state: protection of the territory, political-systemic order, social stability and ensuring a sense of security for citizens (protection of life and health). On the other hand, a wider sense of i.s. goes beyond state institutions, as it derives from the spirit of liberalism, and also adopts a global (supranational) character resulting from various transnational forms of international cooperation. In this understanding of i.s. all social and cultural activities of people are included (e.g., activities of non-governmental organisations). In this situation, the issues of privatization of security and social security appear. The matters of i.s. have not yet received in-depth studies, therefore the concept is not universal. In particular countries, or parts of the world, it is interpreted differently. The nature, types and specificity of threats have an influence on its objective scope. In the United States (the term home security), it covers the issues of: terrorism, organised crime (including drugs), illegal migration and spying, which is the subject of federal institutions. On the other hand, the EU’s Internal Security Strategy lists the following threats: terrorism in every form – marked by absolute disregard for human life and democratic values; organised crime – in various forms, regardless of state borders; cybercrime – a global, technical, cross-border and anonymous threat to information systems; cross-border crime – having a major impact on everyday lives of Europeans; violence (in itself) – increasing the damage already caused by crime and harmful to the society; natural disasters and anthropogenic factors – such as: forest fires, earthquakes, floods, storms, droughts, energy failures and failures of large-scale IT systems [ A. Misiuk ].

Counterliczniki