Translations

Faworytyzm, nepotyzm i kumoterstwo/1/en: Różnice pomiędzy wersjami

Z Encyklopedia Administracji Publicznej

(Utworzono nową stronę "'''FAVOURITISM, NEPOTISM AND CRONYISM''' – negative phenomena from the perspective of observing the principles of public service, but often underestimated and unnotice...")
 
 
Linia 1: Linia 1:
'''FAVOURITISM, NEPOTISM AND CRONYISM''' – negative phenomena from the perspective of observing the principles of public service, but often underestimated and unnoticed. Favouritism is defined as a system of relations in which favourites have positions and influences, cronyism – as mutual support of people related by kinship, intimacy, common, not always honest, interests, and nepotism – as abuse of position by favouring, protecting people closely privately related with an official/politician, his/her relatives. The adverse effects of these phenomena can occur not only within public administration structures (example – financial costs related to decisions made by incompetent, but for example, related employees, or unfavourable and not optimal choices in public tenders), but also – as a result of social and economic impact – beyond it. High level of n. destroys citizens’ trust in public institutions. N. or c. collide with the principle of justice, which consolidates society and forms the basis of a democratic state. Justice in this sense relates to equality between citizens and equal treatment of citizens by public institutions [ [http://encyklopediaap.uw.edu.pl/index.php/Jolanta_Itrich-Drabarek/en J. Itrich-Drabarek] ].
+
'''FAVOURITISM, NEPOTISM AND CRONYISM''' – negative phenomena from the perspective of observing the principles of public service, but often underestimated and unnoticed. '''Favouritism''' is defined as a system of relations in which favourites have positions and influences, '''cronyism''' – as mutual support of people related by kinship, intimacy, common, not always honest, interests, and '''nepotism''' – as abuse of position by favouring, protecting people closely privately related with an official/politician, his/her relatives. The adverse effects of these phenomena can occur not only within public administration structures (example – financial costs related to decisions made by incompetent, but for example, related employees, or unfavourable and not optimal choices in public tenders), but also – as a result of social and economic impact – beyond it. High level of n. destroys citizens’ trust in public institutions. N. or c. collide with the principle of justice, which consolidates society and forms the basis of a democratic state. Justice in this sense relates to equality between citizens and equal treatment of citizens by public institutions [ [http://encyklopediaap.uw.edu.pl/index.php/Jolanta_Itrich-Drabarek/en J. Itrich-Drabarek] ].

Aktualna wersja na dzień 19:29, 16 maj 2018

Objaśnienie komunikatu (prześlij)

Ten komunikat nie posiada dokumentacji. Jeśli wiesz gdzie lub jak ten komunikat jest używany, możesz pomóc innym tłumaczom przez dodanie dokumentacji do tego komunikatu.

Tekst źródłowy komunikatu (Faworytyzm, nepotyzm i kumoterstwo)
'''FAWORYTYZM, NEPOTYZM I KUMOTERSTWO''' – zjawiska negatywne z perspektywy przestrzegania zasad służby publicznej, jednak często bagatelizowane i niezauważane. '''Faworytyzm''' określa się jako układ stosunków, w którym ulubieńcy mają stanowiska i wpływy, '''kumoterstwo''' – jako wzajemne popieranie się ludzi związanych pokrewieństwem, zażyłością, wspólnymi, nie zawsze uczciwymi interesami, a '''nepotyzm''' – nadużycie zajmowanego stanowiska przez faworyzowanie, protegowanie osób blisko prywatnie związanych z urzędnikiem/politykiem, jego krewnych. Niekorzystne skutki tych zjawisk mogą nastąpić nie tylko wewnątrz struktur administracji publicznej (przykład – koszty finansowe związane z decyzjami podejmowanymi przez niekompetentnych, lecz np. spokrewnionych pracowników czy niekorzystne i nieoptymalne wybory przy przetargach publicznych), lecz również – w wyniku oddziaływania społecznego i ekonomicznego – poza nią. Wysoki poziom n. niszczy zaufanie obywatela do instytucji życia publicznego. N. czy k. wchodzą w kolizję z zasadą sprawiedliwości, która konsoliduje społeczeństwo i tworzy podstawy państwa demokratycznego. Sprawiedliwość tak rozumiana dotyczy równości obywateli wobec prawa oraz równości traktowania ich przez instytucje publiczne [ [http://encyklopediaap.uw.edu.pl/index.php/Jolanta_Itrich-Drabarek J. Itrich-Drabarek] ].
Tłumaczenie'''FAVOURITISM, NEPOTISM AND CRONYISM''' – negative phenomena from the perspective of observing the principles of public service, but often underestimated and unnoticed. '''Favouritism''' is defined as a system of relations in which favourites have positions and influences, '''cronyism''' – as mutual support of people related by kinship, intimacy, common, not always honest, interests, and '''nepotism''' – as abuse of position by favouring, protecting people closely privately related with an official/politician, his/her relatives. The adverse effects of these phenomena can occur not only within public administration structures (example – financial costs related to decisions made by incompetent, but for example, related employees, or unfavourable and not optimal choices in public tenders), but also – as a result of social and economic impact – beyond it. High level of n. destroys citizens’ trust in public institutions. N. or c. collide with the principle of justice, which consolidates society and forms the basis of a democratic state. Justice in this sense relates to equality between citizens and equal treatment of citizens by public institutions [ [http://encyklopediaap.uw.edu.pl/index.php/Jolanta_Itrich-Drabarek/en J. Itrich-Drabarek] ].

FAVOURITISM, NEPOTISM AND CRONYISM – negative phenomena from the perspective of observing the principles of public service, but often underestimated and unnoticed. Favouritism is defined as a system of relations in which favourites have positions and influences, cronyism – as mutual support of people related by kinship, intimacy, common, not always honest, interests, and nepotism – as abuse of position by favouring, protecting people closely privately related with an official/politician, his/her relatives. The adverse effects of these phenomena can occur not only within public administration structures (example – financial costs related to decisions made by incompetent, but for example, related employees, or unfavourable and not optimal choices in public tenders), but also – as a result of social and economic impact – beyond it. High level of n. destroys citizens’ trust in public institutions. N. or c. collide with the principle of justice, which consolidates society and forms the basis of a democratic state. Justice in this sense relates to equality between citizens and equal treatment of citizens by public institutions [ J. Itrich-Drabarek ].

Counterliczniki